Post by account_disabled on Nov 27, 2023 6:47:24 GMT
which they link –Richard Jean February 1, 2010 at 9:35 pm Overkilling the nofollow tag can actually waste page rank, Google still counts it as a link off the page in question so the algorithm counts it as a dispersal but if it’s not followed then down the drain it goes. Im sure that Google will be cracking down on page rank sculpting very soon, if a page is not to be indexed, use noindex, Asia Mobile Number List
follow. John S. Britsios (aka Webnauts) February 2, 2010 at 1:52 am @jean, 1. Overkilling the nofollow tag does not waste page PageRank. If you would attri
bute an internal link with nofollow, and if Google sees that as a link, then due to the nofollow, your link cannot pass PR, and will be end, so you will obviously leak PR. In other words, you are going into nodes or dangling pages trouble. 2. It is already a year since Google cracked down the PageRank Sculpting, but they announced that on the 15th of June last year. So no worries. If you have fun using the nofollow for internal links, go for it. 3. You can use the noindex meta tag if you do not want bots to index a page, maybe also add
ing the nosnippet , just in case someone is linking to the page and you do not want Google to show snippets in the search results. The follow is redundant since sarch engines follow by default. Take care, John Shubham February 9, 2010 at 9:05 am this happened with me..Well this post is just awesome..! nofollow is really bad .! TonyNap March 1, 2010 at 8:36 am I am a Roofer. I asvertise on a directory-website and a salesperson (from another company) trying to sell me SEO, pointed out to me that in the code of the directory’s-website they use “noFollow” on link to my page. He then told me that this costs me SEO credits I could be receiving. The site I advertise with is telling me it’s not true.
follow. John S. Britsios (aka Webnauts) February 2, 2010 at 1:52 am @jean, 1. Overkilling the nofollow tag does not waste page PageRank. If you would attri
bute an internal link with nofollow, and if Google sees that as a link, then due to the nofollow, your link cannot pass PR, and will be end, so you will obviously leak PR. In other words, you are going into nodes or dangling pages trouble. 2. It is already a year since Google cracked down the PageRank Sculpting, but they announced that on the 15th of June last year. So no worries. If you have fun using the nofollow for internal links, go for it. 3. You can use the noindex meta tag if you do not want bots to index a page, maybe also add
ing the nosnippet , just in case someone is linking to the page and you do not want Google to show snippets in the search results. The follow is redundant since sarch engines follow by default. Take care, John Shubham February 9, 2010 at 9:05 am this happened with me..Well this post is just awesome..! nofollow is really bad .! TonyNap March 1, 2010 at 8:36 am I am a Roofer. I asvertise on a directory-website and a salesperson (from another company) trying to sell me SEO, pointed out to me that in the code of the directory’s-website they use “noFollow” on link to my page. He then told me that this costs me SEO credits I could be receiving. The site I advertise with is telling me it’s not true.